People Escaping Poverty Project Position
Communities In Defense Committee (CID)
Reports support changing criminal background reports
PEPP’s original position was to eliminate the use of Criminal Background checks as a tool for landlords
to use in tenant screening. In March of 2000, the Moorhead police
department did implement changes that limited the type of information
being reported to landlords. The police department now produces amended
printouts of "involvement’s" with the police that are not over 10 years
old. The CID Database report is purged of instances where the person
reported a crime, was a victim, a witness, or was simply mentioned in a
report.
These were important and worthwhile changes, however the police
Department continues to report people as "suspects" and list arrests
without any conviction information. Our current position is that
the Moorhead Police Department should eliminate the use of Suspect on
CID’s and only list Arrests that are associated with a conviction when
producing a background report for a landlord.
There are three major reports that supports PEPP’s position on
the CID Issue.
The first report supporting our position was published in January
2001. January 2001. This is a report of the Minnesota Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on
Civil Rights from their fact finding meeting that was held in May
of 1999.
In the section on Findings and Recommendations, 3. Public Safety,
the commission states the following finding and recommendation:
- Finding 3.2. The Crime Free Multi-Housing Program provided to
landlords promotes de facto segregation in housing by virtue of its
adverse impact on Latinos and American Indians. The Committee is
troubled by ties between police and landlords in providing data on
prospective tenants. The Committee holds that such a practice goes far
beyond normal police functions, may violate state privacy laws, and
certainly adds fuel to the distrust that exists between the minority
community and the police.
- Recommendation 3.2. The Crime Free Multi-Housing Program
needs reassessment. First, that reassessment should be done in open
meetings so that the public can view and hear all elements brought to
bear on both the purpose and implementation of the program. Second, now
that there is some history of the program an assessment should be done
considering the demonstrated—not hypothetical—benefits of the program
against the costs of the program both in terms of policing resources
and the social costs of marginalizing the minority community.
A second report, produced by The
Moorhead Justice Circle, was given to the Moorhead Human rights
Commission in October of 2001. The Justice Circles had formed Citizen
Action Teams that focused on 4 main areas covered in the Civil Rights
report. The Housing and Public Accommodation Citizen Action Team
produced the Following Recommendation concerning the CID issue:
- Objective 6: Background information given to landlords by the
police department on potential renters wi11 contain only criminal
conviction information. The word "suspect" needs to be removed tom CID
reports. "Suspect" can be misinterpreted or inappropriately used. A
follow-up study of the Criminal Background check needs to take place.
A third report, that was presented on March 18, 2002 by the Moorhead Housing Task
Force, also commented on the CID issue and has made the following
Finding and Recommendation in Section 4 on Page 77 and 78 of the 100
page report:
- Modify the Crime Free Multi-Housing Program Related to
Criminal Background Checks - The Crime Free Multi-Housing Program and
the implementation of criminal background checks have received almost
unanimous support from developers, builders, and advocates alike by
providing a tool to ensure safe living environments for renters. The
City provides landlords with information from the Central Intelligence
Database (CID), which contains more information than Bureau of Criminal
Apprehension (BCA) report and other methods. Advocacy groups feel that
the criminal background check should be limited to convictions
(currently, information regarding suspect,- arrest, and convictions is
released). The Police Department believes that, because all information
in a CID report is public information, landlords should utilize their
discretion in what information they receive through this voluntary
program. Several recent changes implemented by the Police Department
have addressed some concerns of the advocacy groups. The groups also
suggested the City of Moorhead seek a private agency to conduct the
background checks in the future. This would result in landlord costs
that would be passed along to housing applicants.
- Recommendation: The City of Moorhead should promote the
Crime Free Multi-Housing Program as a true asset to the community by
providing promotional materials, such as signs, plaques, and other
acknowledgments to those rental property owners that participate in the
Crime Free Multi-Housing Program.
- Recommendation: The City of Moorhead should further modify
the Crime Free Multi-Housing Program procedures to eliminate any
references listing "suspect" and/or calls for detox service from the
background report release form, limiting information released to
arrests and convictions unless otherwise requested by the landlord.
Conclusion:
All three of these reports support the position that the information
given to landlords by the Moorhead Police department under the
assumption of being a criminal background needs to be changed by the
Moorhead City Council.
It is the position of the PEPP CID group that if the City council of
Moorhead insists that the Moorhead Police Department continue to provide
background checks as a part of the Crime Free Multi-Housing Program,
that the use of "suspect" on CID’s should be eliminated and that no
arrests should be listed without a corresponding conviction on the
record.
Back to the PEPP Home Page